From: Nursing informatics and patient safety outcomes in critical care settings: a systematic review
 | Behrendt et al., 2014 | Hanneman et al., 2015 | Linton et al., 2021 | Mann et al., 2011 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Q1. Was true randomization used for assignment of participants to treatment groups? | X | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Q2. Was allocation to treatment groups concealed? | X | X | X | ✔ |
Q3. Were treatment groups similar at the baseline? (Rationale: to minimise selection bias) | ✔ | ✔ | NA | ✔ |
Q4. Were participants blind to treatment assignment? | ✔ | ✔ | X | ✔ |
Q5. Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment? | X | X | X | X |
Q6. Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment? | U | ✔ | X | X |
Q7. Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest? (Rationale: to minimise performance bias) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Q8. Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed? | NA | NA | ✔ | ✔ |
Q9. Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Q10. Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups? (Rationale: to minimise detection bias ) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Q11. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? (Rationale: to minimise risks of weakening the validity of inferences about the statistical relationships between ‘cause’ and ‘effect’.) | ✔ | X | ✔ | ✔ |
Q12. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? (Rationale: to minimise errors of statistical inference.) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Q13. Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomization, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial? | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Overall appraisal | I | E | E | I |