Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Nursing

Fig. 4

From: Comparative efficacy and acceptability of resilience-focused interventions for nurses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fig. 4

Forest plot of resilience intervention programs’ effectiveness. The forest plot shows standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 22 resilience-focused intervention comparisons in 21 studies. The black diamond at the bottom of the graph represents the pooled standardized mean difference following random effects meta-analyses. A positive value reflects that the corresponding resilience-focused intervention leads to an improvement in nurses’ resilience with respect to the control group. (1) Biofeedback Training interventions vs. Treat as usual; (2) Smartphone-delivered Biofeedback Training interventions vs. Treat as usual; (3) Positive Psychology-Based Interventive Program vs. Treat as usual; (4) Professional Training combined with Positive Psychology Intervention vs. Treat as usual

Back to article page

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us