Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics

From: Effectiveness of virtual clinical learning in nursing education: a systematic review

No

Author

Year

Design

Population

Intervention

Comparison

Outcomes

Dose

    

Age#

Years or

Range or Mean/SD

Gender

Female (%) or M(SD)

Sample size

Samples conditions

  

Variables

Instruments

1

Kim [42]

2012

Quasi-experimental

Exp = 22.4(1.3)

Cont = 22.4(1.3)

NA

70

Nursing students

Simulation-based education

Conventional pre-clinical practice orientation

Communication skills

Clinical competence

Nursing process

Direct nursing intervention

Psychosocial nursing

Education for patients

Basic nursing performance

Physical examination patient

and monitoring

Communication skill tool

Clinical competence tool

D: NR

C: 5 weeks

F: 3 sessions

2

Lee [43]

2016

Quasi-experimental

10(20.4)

NA

49

Nursing students

Clinical reasoning

Usual care

Nursing core competencies

Academic self-efficacy

Problem solving

Nursing core competencies measurement tool,

Academic

self-efficacy tool

Problem solving skills tool

D: 120-minutes

C: 16-weeks

F: weekly

3

Choi [44]

2018

Quasi-experimental

21.7(2.2)

55(94.8)

58

Nursing students

Practicum with AEMR

Conventional

Practicum

Critical thinking

Satisfaction

Critical thinking Disposition Scale

Self-developed scale

D: NR

C: NR

F: NR

4

Kang & Yu [45]

2018

Quasi-experimental

Cont = 21.9(2.6)

Exp: 21.6(1.0)

Cont: 60(95.2)

Exp: 53(88.3)

123

Nursing students

SSD and ID

Received only ID

Problem solving

Perceptions of instructors’

efficacy in conducting debriefing

Debriefing satisfaction

Problem Solving Process inventory

Team effectiveness tool

DASH

10-cm visual analogue scale

D: 4-hours

C: 5-sessions

F: unclear

5

Bate [46]

2019

Quasi-experimental

NA

115(87.5%)

132

Nursing students

Active role

Observers’ role

Anxiety

Satisfaction

Self-confidence in learning

Clinical ability

Problem solving

Confidence in clinical practice

Collaboration

STAI

SCLS

SLEI

D: NR

C: NR

F: NR

6

Kim [47]

2019

Quasi-experimental

Exp 22.9 (2.8)

Cont 22.7(1.9)

32(94.1)

74

Nursing students

Simulation

Self-directed learning

College life Satisfaction

Number of simulations

Experience

Self-confidence

Assessment

Diagnosis

Implementation

Evaluation

Clinical judgment

Noticing

Interpreting

Responding

Reflecting

Clinical decision making

Search for alternatives or options

Canvassing of objectives and values

Evaluation and reevaluation of consequences

Search for information and

Unbiased assimilation of

new information

Self-confidence for problem-solving

CDMNS

D: 70-minutes

C: NR

F: NR

7

Oh [48]

2021

RCT

TLT = 20.6(0.70)

Cont = (20.8(0.6)

NA

56

Nursing students

TLT + Debriefing

TLT only

Knowledge

Problem solving

Critical thinking disposition

Reflection

Knowledge scale questionnaire

Problem solving process tool

Critical thinking disposition scale

Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric

D: 50-minutes

C: three meetings

F: NR

8

Seo & Eom [49]

2021

Quasi-experimental

NA

34(75.6%)

45

Nursing students

Simulation nursing education

Clinical traditional practicum

Clinical reasoning

Problem-solving process

Self-efficacy

OPT model for clinical reasoning

Problem-solving process scale

Neuroscience Nursing Self-Efficacy Scale

D: 60-hours

C: 10-days

F: 2-weeks

9

Chang [31]

2022

Quasi-experimental

Average age was 21

Unspecified

42

Nursing students

MVR-SLS

Traditional instruction

OSCE competency, problem solving, engagement and learning satisfaction.

LSS, PSQ, OSCE competency examination,

D: unclear

C: 3 weeks

F: NR

10

Cengiz [50]

2023

RCT

Experimental19.6(1.19);

Control 19.4(1.08)

81(72%)

112

Nursing students

Scenario-based simulation

Usual care

Problem solving

Self-efficacy

Problem solving inventory

Self-efficacy scale

D: 90-minutes

C: NR

F: 2-days

11

Chang [51]

2024

Quasi-experimental

Unspecified

Unspecified

44

Nursing students

Scenario game-based learning

Adopted video-based learning

Learning performance

Communication

Collaboration

Critical thinking

Complex problem solving

Creative thinking

Computational thinking

Communication, collaboration, complex problem solving, and creative thinking questionnaire, critical thinking tendency scale &

computational thinking scale

D: 100 min

C: 5 weeks

F: weekly

12

Lin [30]

2024

Quasi-experimental

Average 19 years

NA

123

Nursing students

Computational thinking concept based PBL activity

Conventional PBL activity

Learning achievement

Problem solving skills

Confidence

Self-developed scale

Problem solving skills questionnaire

Confidence questionnaire

D: NR

C: 4-months

F: NR

  1. NA = Not Available; STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults; SCLS = Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale; SLEI = Simulation Learning Effectiveness Inventory; RCT = Randomized Controlled Trial; SD = Standard Deviation; SG = Simulation by Gaming; D = Duration; C = Course; F = Frequency; LSS = Learning Satisfaction Scale; AEMR = Academic Electronic Medical Record; DASH = Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare; SSD = Student Self Debriefing; TBL = Team Based Learning; PBL = Problem Based Learning; MILD System = Mobile interactive learning and diagnosis; ID = Instructor debriefing; MVR-SLS = Maternity virtual reality-based situated learning systems