Skip to main content

Table 4 T-value, pearson correlation coefficient, factor loadings, ICC, and Macdonald Omega of the Rushton moral resilience scale (RMRS) and sub-scales

From: Cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS)

Factor

No

T−valuea

b(λ)

Rc

ICC

Macdonal ω

Factor 1

Responses to moral adversity

Q1

11.01

0.66***

0.496**

0.619

(CI, 95%: 0.575 − 0.660)

0.716

Q2

− 0.80

− 0.05

 

Q3

3.24

0.20***

0.446**

Q4

10.41

0.62***

0.520**

Q5

10.64

0.64***

0.486**

Factor 4

Personal integrity

Q6

4.56

0.74***

0.133**

0.516

(CI, 95%: 0.436 − 0.585)

0.624

Q7

4.12

0.42***

0.270**

Q8

0.17

0.01

 

Factor 3

Moral efficacy

Q9

6.83

0.44***

0.398**

0.639

(CI,95%: 0.592 − 0.682)

0.638

Q10

7.89

0.52***

0.291**

Q11

9.32

0.63***

0.289**

Q12

7.96

0.52***

0.354**

Factor 2

Relational integrity

Q13

8.66

0.55***

0.453**

0.614

(CI,95%: 0.533 − 0.686)

0.644

Q14

7.17

0.45***

0.286**

Q15

8.75

0.55***

0.342**

Q16

7.02

0.45***

0.395**

Q17

6.41

0.41***

0.486**

The Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS)

0.715

(CI, 95%: 0.677 − 0.749)

0.728

  1. ***P < 0.001
  2. (a) The calculated values for all factor loadings of the first and second orders are greater than 1.96, indicating significance at the 95% confidence level. (b) The specific value, denoted by the Lambda coefficient (λ), is calculated from the sum of the factor loadings related to all the variables of that factor. (c) Pearson correlation coefficient