Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 6 Reliability indices for different model specifications

From: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the quality of nursing care scale among hospital nurses: a bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling analysis

Model

Unidimensional CFA

 

7-factor CFA

 

Bifactor ESEM

Indices

Chrobach α

 

CR (ω)

 

AVE

 

ω

 

ωH

 

ECV

QNC

0.96

 

0.96

 

0.51

 

0.98

 

0.94

 

0.71

PS

0.79

 

0.80

 

0.57

 

0.82

 

0.36

 

0.05

HP

0.86

 

0.86

 

0.67

 

0.86

 

0.17

 

0.04

PC

0.83

 

0.84

 

0.64

 

0.87

 

0.14

 

0.04

SC

0.90

 

0.91

 

0.72

 

0.92

 

0.09

 

0.03

FR

0.85

 

0.86

 

0.61

 

0.87

 

0.02

 

0.02

NCO

0.65

 

0.66

 

0.50

 

0.68

 

0.34

 

0.04

RR

0.92

 

0.92

 

0.67

 

0.96

 

0.21

 

0.07

  1. Note: CFA = confirmatory factor analysis; ESEM = exploratory structural equation modeling; CR = composite reliability; AVE = average variance extracted; ω = omega; ωH = hierarchical omega; ECV = explained common variance; QNC = quality of nursing care; PS = patient satisfaction; HP = health promotion; PC = prevention of complications; SC = well-being and self-care; FR = functional readaptation; NCO = nursing care organization; RR = responsibility and rigor. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001
Back to article page

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us