Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Perimenopausal contraception in Turkish women: A cross-sectional study

Original Submission
22 Sep 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margareta Larsson
4 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ernest Orji
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Nevin Sahin
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margareta Larsson
13 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Nevin Sahin
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Nevin Sahin
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
11 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margareta Larsson
24 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Nevin Sahin
Resubmission - Version 8
24 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 8
15 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margareta Larsson
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
5 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Nevin Sahin
Resubmission - Version 10
5 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 10
7 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Nevin Sahin
Resubmission - Version 11
7 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
8 Mar 2007 Editorially accepted
8 Mar 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6955-6-1

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page