Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of case Mrs I: Relationship between professional caregiver (PC) and person with dementia (PWD)

From: The influence of relationships on personhood in dementia care: a qualitative, hermeneutic study

VIPS - criteria

Data

V aluing the person

Had no biographical knowledge of the PWD

Treated the PWD with respect but the PC said that this was difficult at times. When she came to help the PWD in the mornings and found her lying fully dressed on her bed, she did not offer to help her shower. In her opinion this would have been disrespectful because it would have reflected that she did not believe the PWD when she said she was done showering.

 

I ndividualised approach

Focused on physical needs, gave individualised care

P erspective of the PWD

PC had no knowledge of dementia and did not attempt to understand the subjective experience of the PWD

S ocial environment

No time to consider psycho-social needs because of a heavy workload

Had only met FC twice in two years

 
 

No contact between PC in the home nursing services and staff at the day centre

  1. Conclusion: Unprofessional relationship. Although the PC individualised the physical care that was given, other elements (V, P and S) in person-centred care were overlooked and thus personhood was diminished.