Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 6 Peri-operative nurses’ reported practice relating to case studies (n=70)

From: Peri-operative nurses’ knowledge and reported practice of pressure injury risk assessment and prevention: A before-after intervention study

 

Pre-intervention Mean (SD) (Range)

Post-intervention Mean (SD) (Range)

P-value+

Pressure injury risk assessment

Case study 1: Risk assessment score completed when patient’s condition changes

2.62 (1.56) (1–5)

2.0 (1.08) (1–5)

0.136

Case study 2: Risk assessment score completed when pressure damage is identified

2.07 (1.49) (1–5)

1.29 (0.47) (1–5)

0.085

Clinical handover from ward nurse (admission to operating room)

Case study 3: Risk assessment score is:

   

 Viewed in patient notes

3.37 (1.55) (1–5)

2.80 (1.47) (1–5)

0.069

 Verbally reported

3.33 (1.46) (1–5)

2.96 (1.40) (1–5)

0.120

Clinical handover from operating room nurse (transfer to recovery unit)

Case study 4: Risk assessment score is:

   

 Viewed in patient notes

3.39 (1.52) (1–5)

3.09 (1.43) (1–5)

0.223

 Verbally reported

3.40 (1.55) (1–5)

2.86 (1.46) (1–5)

0.023

Clinical handover from recovery room nurse (discharge to ward)

Case study 5: Risk assessment score is

   

 Viewed in patient notes

3.09 (1.49) (1–5)

2.64 (1.43) (1–5)

0.142

 Verbally reported

3.03 (1.49) (1–5)

2.52 (1.35) (1–5)

0.045

  1. +Paired sample t-tests were used.